UrologyCompare › Head to head
Olympus RenaFlex vs Pusen Medical PU400A
Both are single-use ureteroscopes. Every figure below is transcribed from the manufacturers' own documents.
What separates them
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the slimmer shaft — 9.2 Fr against 9.5 Fr for the Olympus RenaFlex.
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the larger working channel — 5.1 Fr against 3.6 Fr for the Olympus RenaFlex.
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the wider deflection — 285° against 270° for the Olympus RenaFlex.
Olympus RenaFlex
- Insertion / shaft diameter
- 9.5 Fr outer diameter
- Working channel
- 3.6 Fr
- Deflection
- 270° up / 270° down
- Image resolution
- Not stated
- Field of view
- 120°, with auto white balance and brightness
- Working length
- Not stated
- Runs on
- Olympus CV-S1 Video System Center for flexible single-use endoscopes
- Regulatory status
- FDA 510(k) clearance announced April 2024. UK status not stated in the cited document
- Laser / energy compatibility
- Not stated in the cited document
- Sterility and packaging
- Not stated in the cited document
- NHS Supply Chain
- Not confirmed — no framework listing on file
Pusen Medical PU400A
- Insertion / shaft diameter
- 9.2 Fr
- Working channel
- 5.1 Fr
- Deflection
- 285° up / 285° down
- Image resolution
- Not stated (Full HD)
- Field of view
- 120°
- Working length
- 650 mm
- Runs on
- Pusen PV300 image processor
- Regulatory status
- Not stated in the cited document
- Laser / energy compatibility
- Not stated in the cited document
- Sterility and packaging
- Not stated in the cited document
- NHS Supply Chain
- Not confirmed — no framework listing on file
Olympus RenaFlex in full · Pusen Medical PU400A in full