UrologyCompare › Head to head
Cook Medical Ascend 8.6 Fr vs Pusen Medical PU400A
Both are single-use ureteroscopes. Every figure below is transcribed from the manufacturers' own documents.
What separates them
- Cook Medical Ascend 8.6 Fr has the slimmer shaft — 8.6 Fr against 9.2 Fr for the Pusen Medical PU400A.
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the larger working channel — 5.1 Fr against 3.6 Fr for the Cook Medical Ascend 8.6 Fr.
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the wider deflection — 285° against 275° for the Cook Medical Ascend 8.6 Fr.
Cook Medical Ascend 8.6 Fr
- Insertion / shaft diameter
- 8.6 Fr
- Working channel
- 3.6 Fr
- Deflection
- 275° up / 275° down
- Image resolution
- Not stated
- Field of view
- 120°
- Working length
- 670 mm
- Runs on
- Endoscopic Video Image Processor, ASUS-IPD-V100 (10.1" LCD)
- Regulatory status
- Not stated in the cited document
- Laser / energy compatibility
- Quanta System lasers and fibres, sold by Cook in the UK, Ireland, Austria, France, Germany, Switzerland and the US
- Sterility and packaging
- Not stated in the cited document
- NHS Supply Chain
- Not confirmed — no framework listing on file
Pusen Medical PU400A
- Insertion / shaft diameter
- 9.2 Fr
- Working channel
- 5.1 Fr
- Deflection
- 285° up / 285° down
- Image resolution
- Not stated (Full HD)
- Field of view
- 120°
- Working length
- 650 mm
- Runs on
- Pusen PV300 image processor
- Regulatory status
- Not stated in the cited document
- Laser / energy compatibility
- Not stated in the cited document
- Sterility and packaging
- Not stated in the cited document
- NHS Supply Chain
- Not confirmed — no framework listing on file
Cook Medical Ascend 8.6 Fr in full · Pusen Medical PU400A in full