UrologyCompare › Head to head
Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite vs Pusen Medical PU400A
Both are single-use ureteroscopes. Every figure below is transcribed from the manufacturers' own documents.
What separates them
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the slimmer shaft — 9.2 Fr against 9.5 Fr for the Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite.
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the larger working channel — 5.1 Fr against 3.6 Fr for the Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite.
- Pusen Medical PU400A has the wider deflection — 285° against 270° for the Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite.
Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite
- Insertion / shaft diameter
- 9.5 Fr shaft · 7.7 Fr distal tip
- Working channel
- 3.6 Fr
- Deflection
- 270° up / 270° down
- Image resolution
- Not stated (high-resolution digital chip)
- Field of view
- 120° diagonal
- Working length
- 680 mm (68 cm)
- Runs on
- StoneSmart Connect Console — outputs to existing theatre monitors
- Regulatory status
- Not stated in the cited document
- Laser / energy compatibility
- Not stated in the cited document
- Sterility and packaging
- Not stated in the cited document
- NHS Supply Chain
- Not confirmed — no framework listing on file
Pusen Medical PU400A
- Insertion / shaft diameter
- 9.2 Fr
- Working channel
- 5.1 Fr
- Deflection
- 285° up / 285° down
- Image resolution
- Not stated (Full HD)
- Field of view
- 120°
- Working length
- 650 mm
- Runs on
- Pusen PV300 image processor
- Regulatory status
- Not stated in the cited document
- Laser / energy compatibility
- Not stated in the cited document
- Sterility and packaging
- Not stated in the cited document
- NHS Supply Chain
- Not confirmed — no framework listing on file
Boston Scientific LithoVue Elite in full · Pusen Medical PU400A in full